What consumer brands need to know about SBTi's new net zero standard (V2)
Written by Jack Linnett (Co-founder & CEO)

What consumer brands need to know about SBTi's new net zero standard (V2)
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) just released Version 2 of its Corporate Net-Zero Standard—the global framework for cutting emissions aligned with 1.5℃ science. For consumer brands and shoppers, these updates change how net zero gets measured, reported, and communicated.
Let's break down what's new, why it matters for retail and how consumers can read between the lines when brands talk climate.
3 key changes in SBTi V2 that impact consumer brands
1. Scope 3 targets are now mandatory (for most brands)
Previous (V1.3) | New (V2) |
|---|---|
Scope 3 required only if ≥40% of total | All Category A companies must set Scope 3 targets |
Minimum 67% of Scope 3 covered | Cover all "relevant" categories (any ≥5% of total) |
No supplier engagement requirement | 100% of Tier 1 suppliers in emissions-intensive activities must transition to Net Zero by 2030 |
Apparel, food & beverage, and retail brands typically have 80–95% Scope 3 emissions (manufacturing, packaging, shipping). V2 forces head-on supply chain action.
2. Separate targets for Scope 1, 2, and 3
Scope | What Changed |
|---|---|
Scope 1(direct) | Must cover 100% (previously 95%) |
Scope 2(electricity) | Requires two targets: location-based + market-based |
Scope 3 (value chain) | New flexibility: alignment targets (green procurement, revenue) instead of just absolute reductions |
Consumers will see more granular data—manufacturing vs. shipping vs. store emissions.
3. Mandatory transition plans + annual reporting
Publish climate transition plan within 12 months of validation
Annual reporting for material Scope 3; full report every 3 years
Limited assurance (third-party verification) required
Less room for vague claims. Brands must show concrete steps and progress data.
What consumers should watch for
The messaging shift: Environmental → Resilience
61% of companies reframing climate messaging toward resilience, risk mitigation, and preparedness due to political skepticism.
But 78% will continue net zero regardless of politics because "it's good for business". 69% increased net zero action over the past 12 months.
What this means: Brands may say "business resilience" instead of "climate action"—but emissions cuts are still happening.
Trust signals for credible messaging
What Consumers Want | What to Look For |
|---|---|
Plain language | Specific actions with data |
Transparent imagery | 81% prefer visuals showing direct environmental effects |
Consequences + solutions | 55% want inaction consequences, not just optimism |
Proof of progress | 75% want visuals showing climate action |
Red flags: "Carbon neutral by 2030" without transition plan or verification.
Green flags: SBTi-validated targets, published transition plans, Scope 3 data with supplier goals.
📅 Timeline: When V2 becomes mandatory
Date | What Happens |
|---|---|
2026 | V2 final approved by SBTi board |
Through Dec 2027 | V1.3 still allowed for submissions |
Jan 1, 2028 | V2 mandatory for new targets |
2035 onwards | Category A must support carbon removals (1% of emissions) |
Where Earthmark comes in
At Earthmark, we build AI-powered environmental data platforms making climate action visible, comparable, actionable. SBTi V2's stricter reporting means:
More standardized data = easier retailer benchmarking
Scope 3 transparency = consumers compare supply chain emissions
Mandatory transition plans = brands show concrete decarbonization steps
This regulatory clarity makes ESG benchmarking work at scale.
Quick takeaways
For consumer brands:
✅ Set Scope 3 targets for all ≥5% categories
✅ Publish transition plan within 12 months
✅ Engage 100% of Tier 1 suppliers by 2030
✅ Report annually on material Scope 3
For consumers:
🔍 Look for SBTi-validated targets (not just "carbon neutral")
🔍 Check for published transition plans with timelines
🔍 Trust data-backed messaging over vague promises
🔍 "Resilience" language still means emissions cuts happening
Want to benchmark your favourite brands' environmental data? Earthmark makes corporate climate transparency accessible. Get started →
Sources: SBTi, Real Economy Progress, UNFCCC, Ramboll, Latham & Watkins LLP, Seismic Change, ESG Dive, Climate Advocacy Lab, Carbon Maps